Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Redwood, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Redwood, NY.

Data Friendship Redwood
Population 681 304
Median Age 50.3 years 27.1 years
Median Income $45,208 $127,583
Married Families 33.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Friendship vs Redwood

  • In Friendship, the population is higher at 681, compared to 304 in Redwood.
  • Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 27.1 years in Redwood.
  • Redwood has a higher median income of $127,583, compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
  • In Redwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
  • Friendship has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Redwood.
  • The unemployment rate in Friendship is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Redwood.

Demographics

Demographics Friendship vs Redwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Friendship Redwood
Black 5 Data is updating
White 84 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Redwood

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Friendship at 5% compared to 0% in Redwood.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Redwood at 100% compared to 84% in Friendship.
  • Both Friendship and Redwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Friendship at 1% compared to 0% in Redwood.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Friendship at 9% compared to 0% in Redwood.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Friendship at 1% compared to 0% in Redwood.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Friendship Redwood
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.4% 10.5%
Depression 24.3% 24.9%
Smoking 21.6% 20.9%
Binge Drinking 23.9% 20.7%
Obesity 39.3% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Redwood

  • More residents in Friendship report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.7% in Redwood.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Redwood at 24.9% versus 24.3% in Friendship.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Friendship at 21.6% compared to 20.9% in Redwood.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 20.7% in Redwood.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Friendship at 39.3% compared to 36.6% in Redwood.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Redwood at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Friendship Redwood
No Schooling 0.4% (3) 2.0% (6)
High School Diploma 26.9% (183) 20.7% (63)
Less than High School 26.0% (177) 3.9% (12)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.2% (22) 10.5% (32)

Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Redwood

  • In Redwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Friendship hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 20.7% in Redwood.
  • More residents in Friendship have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 3.9% in Redwood.
  • In Redwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.