Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Purcell, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Purcell, OK.
| Data | Friendship | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 681 | 6,762 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $45,208 | $68,295 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Friendship vs Purcell
- The population in Purcell is higher at 6,762, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 34.7 years in Purcell.
- Purcell has a higher median income of $68,295, compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- In Purcell, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is identical in both Friendship and Purcell at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Friendship is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Purcell.
Demographics
Demographics Friendship vs Purcell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friendship | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 84 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Purcell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Friendship at 5% compared to 1% in Purcell.
- Friendship has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 67% in Purcell.
- Both Friendship and Purcell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Purcell has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Purcell at 13%, compared to 9% in Friendship.
- In Purcell, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Friendship.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friendship | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Purcell
- In Purcell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Purcell at 25.3% versus 24.3% in Friendship.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Friendship at 21.6% compared to 21.0% in Purcell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 14.4% in Purcell.
- Purcell has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Purcell at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friendship | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.4% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (183) | 20.2% (1,367) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (177) | 26.2% (1,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (22) | 12.1% (821) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Purcell
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Friendship and Purcell at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 20.2% in Purcell.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Purcell at 26.2%, compared to 26.0% in Friendship.
- In Purcell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.