Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Norristown, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Norristown, PA.
| Data | Friendship | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 681 | 35,795 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,208 | $59,068 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Friendship vs Norristown
- The population in Norristown is higher at 35,795, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 32.4 years in Norristown.
- Norristown has a higher median income of $59,068, compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Friendship at 33.0% compared to 26.0% in Norristown.
- Friendship has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Norristown.
- The unemployment rate in Friendship is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.3% in Norristown.
Demographics
Demographics Friendship vs Norristown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friendship | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 33 |
| White | 84 | 19 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Norristown
- In Norristown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 19% in Norristown.
- In Norristown, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Friendship.
- Norristown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norristown at 16%, compared to 9% in Friendship.
- In Norristown, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Friendship.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friendship | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Norristown
- In Norristown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Friendship at 24.3% compared to 20.3% in Norristown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Friendship at 21.6% compared to 21.4% in Norristown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 14.9% in Norristown.
- Norristown has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norristown at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friendship | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.3% (479) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (183) | 20.1% (7,193) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (177) | 15.9% (5,695) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (22) | 14.4% (5,148) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Norristown
- In Norristown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 20.1% in Norristown.
- More residents in Friendship have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 15.9% in Norristown.
- In Norristown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.