Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Livingston, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Livingston, AL.
| Data | Friendship | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 681 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 21.2 years |
| Median Income | $45,208 | $20,417 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Friendship vs Livingston
- The population in Livingston is higher at 3,205, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Friendship has a higher median income of $45,208 compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Friendship at 33.0% compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 27%, compared to 12% in Friendship.
- The unemployment rate in Friendship is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Livingston.
Demographics
Demographics Friendship vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friendship | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 58 |
| White | 84 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Livingston
- In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Friendship.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Friendship and Livingston at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Friendship at 9% compared to 2% in Livingston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Friendship at 1% compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friendship | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 12.3% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Livingston
- In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Friendship at 24.3% compared to 22.0% in Livingston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Friendship at 21.6% compared to 21.5% in Livingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Livingston has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friendship | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (183) | 7.7% (248) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (177) | 2.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (22) | 15.5% (496) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Livingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- More residents in Friendship have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.