Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Holly springs, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Holly springs, MS.
Data | Friendship | Holly springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 681 | 6,823 |
Median Age | 50.3 years | 40.6 years |
Median Income | $45,208 | $45,552 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Friendship vs Holly springs
- The population in Holly springs is higher at 6,823, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 40.6 years in Holly springs.
- Holly springs has a higher median income of $45,552, compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Friendship at 33.0% compared to 23.0% in Holly springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Holly springs at 20%, compared to 12% in Friendship.
- Holly springs has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Friendship.
Demographics
Demographics Friendship vs Holly springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Friendship | Holly springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 79 |
White | 84 | 17 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Holly springs
- In Holly springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 79% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 17% in Holly springs.
- Both Friendship and Holly springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Friendship at 1% compared to 0% in Holly springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Friendship at 9% compared to 4% in Holly springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Friendship at 1% compared to 0% in Holly springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Friendship | Holly springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 14.8% |
Depression | 24.3% | 19.8% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 11.9% |
Obesity | 39.3% | 48.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Holly springs
- In Holly springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Friendship at 24.3% compared to 19.8% in Holly springs.
- Holly springs has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 21.6% in Friendship.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 11.9% in Holly springs.
- Holly springs has higher obesity rates at 48.3% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- Disability percentages are higher in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Holly springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Friendship | Holly springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.7% (50) |
High School Diploma | 26.9% (183) | 22.1% (1,509) |
Less than High School | 26.0% (177) | 14.8% (1,007) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (22) | 8.9% (605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Holly springs
- In Holly springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 22.1% in Holly springs.
- More residents in Friendship have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 14.8% in Holly springs.
- In Holly springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.9% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.