Demographics details for Friendship, WI vs Clemmons, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Friendship, WI vs Clemmons, NC.
| Data | Friendship | Clemmons |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 681 | 21,823 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,208 | $75,667 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Friendship vs Clemmons
- The population in Clemmons is higher at 21,823, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- Residents in Friendship have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 42.4 years in Clemmons.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667, compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- The unemployment rate in Friendship is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Clemmons.
Demographics
Demographics Friendship vs Clemmons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Friendship | Clemmons |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 6 |
| White | 84 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Friendship vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 76% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Friendship.
- Clemmons has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Friendship.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Friendship at 9% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Friendship and Clemmons at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Friendship | Clemmons |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 12.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.9% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Friendship vs Clemmons
- More residents in Friendship report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Depression is more prevalent in Friendship at 24.3% compared to 23.7% in Clemmons.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Friendship at 21.6% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 17.8% in Clemmons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Friendship at 39.3% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- Disability percentages are higher in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Friendship | Clemmons |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.6% (140) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (183) | 9.3% (2,040) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (177) | 6.5% (1,429) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.2% (22) | 34.0% (7,418) |
Education Levels Comparison: Friendship vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of residents in Friendship hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- More residents in Friendship have less than a high school education at 26.0% compared to 6.5% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.