Demographics details for Fresno, TX vs Weehawken, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, TX vs Weehawken, NJ.
| Data | Fresno | Weehawken |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,608 | 14,864 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $88,448 | $83,000 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs Weehawken
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 23,608, compared to 14,864 in Weehawken.
- The median age in Weehawken is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $88,448 compared to $83,000 in Weehawken.
- In Weehawken, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Weehawken at 10%, compared to 8% in Fresno.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Weehawken.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs Weehawken provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | Weehawken |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 1 |
| White | Data is updating | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs Weehawken
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fresno at 55% compared to 1% in Weehawken.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Weehawken at 95% compared to 0% in Fresno.
- In Weehawken, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Fresno.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 34% compared to 1% in Weehawken.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 10% compared to 2% in Weehawken.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fresno and Weehawken at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | Weehawken |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs Weehawken
- More residents in Fresno report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fresno at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fresno at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fresno at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fresno at 40.5% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fresno at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | Weehawken |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (470) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (4,980) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,975) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (3,981) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs Weehawken
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- More residents in Fresno have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Weehawken.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.