Demographics details for Fresno, TX vs Okeechobee, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, TX vs Okeechobee, FL.
| Data | Fresno | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,608 | 40,412 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $88,448 | $50,476 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs Okeechobee
- The population in Okeechobee is higher at 40,412, compared to 23,608 in Fresno.
- The median age in Okeechobee is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 37.1 years in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $88,448 compared to $50,476 in Okeechobee.
- In Okeechobee, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Okeechobee at 16%, compared to 8% in Fresno.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in Okeechobee.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs Okeechobee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 55 | 8 |
| White | Data is updating | 58 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs Okeechobee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fresno at 55% compared to 8% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Okeechobee at 58% compared to 0% in Fresno.
- Both Fresno and Okeechobee have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 34% compared to 26% in Okeechobee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 10% compared to 7% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fresno and Okeechobee at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs Okeechobee
- In Okeechobee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in Fresno.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Okeechobee at 20.1% versus 18.3% in Fresno.
- Okeechobee has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 16.3% in Fresno.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Okeechobee at 15.4% compared to 14.5% in Fresno.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fresno at 40.5% compared to 33.9% in Okeechobee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Okeechobee at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (470) | 1.9% (751) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (4,980) | 18.6% (7,520) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (3,975) | 26.7% (10,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (3,981) | 11.8% (4,773) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs Okeechobee
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.9% in Okeechobee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 18.6% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Okeechobee at 26.7%, compared to 16.8% in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.8% in Okeechobee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.