Demographics details for Fresno, CA vs Rockford, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, CA vs Rockford, WA.
| Data | Fresno | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 545,567 | 565 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,001 | $68,750 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs Rockford
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 545,567, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- The median age in Rockford is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Rockford has a higher median income of $68,750, compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- In Rockford, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 6.6%, compared to 4.2% in Rockford.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 10 | 84 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 50 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fresno at 7% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockford at 84% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- The Asian population is larger in Fresno at 14% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 50% compared to 4% in Rockford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 18% compared to 10% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Fresno.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Fresno.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockford at 28.8% versus 17.6% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fresno at 15.5% compared to 15.2% in Rockford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fresno at 37.3% compared to 29.9% in Rockford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (15,183) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (63,519) | 11.9% (67) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (120,693) | 7.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (81,421) | 12.9% (73) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.9% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- More residents in Fresno have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 12.9% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.