Demographics details for Fresno, CA vs New richmond, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, CA vs New richmond, OH.
| Data | Fresno | New richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 545,567 | 2,753 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,001 | $76,760 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs New richmond
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 545,567, compared to 2,753 in New richmond.
- The median age in New richmond is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- New richmond has a higher median income of $76,760, compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- In New richmond, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in New richmond.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 6.6%, compared to 3.2% in New richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs New richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | New richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 4 |
| White | 10 | 89 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 50 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs New richmond
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fresno at 7% compared to 4% in New richmond.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New richmond at 89% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- The Asian population is larger in Fresno at 14% compared to 0% in New richmond.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 50% compared to 3% in New richmond.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 18% compared to 4% in New richmond.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fresno at 1% compared to 0% in New richmond.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | New richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs New richmond
- In New richmond, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.7% in Fresno.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New richmond at 25.5% versus 17.6% in Fresno.
- New richmond has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New richmond at 19.0% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- New richmond has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 37.3% in Fresno.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New richmond at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | New richmond |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (15,183) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (63,519) | 23.4% (643) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (120,693) | 18.1% (498) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (81,421) | 13.4% (369) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs New richmond
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in New richmond.
- In New richmond, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- More residents in Fresno have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 18.1% in New richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 13.4% in New richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.