Demographics details for Fresno, CA vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, CA vs Forest park, GA.
| Data | Fresno | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 545,567 | 19,400 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $63,001 | $41,837 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs Forest park
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 545,567, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- Residents in Fresno have a higher median age of 32.1 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $63,001 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fresno at 30.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Fresno has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Forest park.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 6.6%, compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 55 |
| White | 10 | 8 |
| Asian | 14 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs Forest park
- In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of White residents at 10% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- The Asian population is larger in Fresno at 14% compared to 6% in Forest park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 50% compared to 23% in Forest park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 18% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fresno at 1% compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Fresno.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest park at 17.8% versus 17.6% in Fresno.
- Forest park has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fresno at 13.7% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Forest park has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 37.3% in Fresno.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest park at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (15,183) | 2.6% (504) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (63,519) | 18.4% (3,567) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (120,693) | 21.7% (4,202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (81,421) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs Forest park
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 2.6% in Forest park.
- In Forest park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- More residents in Fresno have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 21.7% in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.