Demographics details for Fresno, CA vs Cuyahoga falls, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, CA vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.
| Data | Fresno | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 545,567 | 50,655 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $63,001 | $67,922 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs Cuyahoga falls
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 545,567, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
- The median age in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922, compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 6.6%, compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 5 |
| White | 10 | 81 |
| Asian | 14 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs Cuyahoga falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fresno at 7% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 81% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- The Asian population is larger in Fresno at 14% compared to 6% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 50% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 18% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fresno at 1% compared to 0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs Cuyahoga falls
- More residents in Fresno report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 17.6% in Fresno.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Cuyahoga falls has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 37.3% in Fresno.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (15,183) | 1.6% (825) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (63,519) | 19.4% (9,813) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (120,693) | 6.3% (3,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (81,421) | 26.1% (13,215) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs Cuyahoga falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.6% in Cuyahoga falls.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- More residents in Fresno have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- In Cuyahoga falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.