Demographics details for Fresno, CA vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, CA vs College park, MD.
| Data | Fresno | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 545,567 | 34,190 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 21.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,001 | $76,973 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs College park
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 545,567, compared to 34,190 in College park.
- Residents in Fresno have a higher median age of 32.1 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973, compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fresno at 30.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- Fresno has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in College park.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 6.6%, compared to 5.5% in College park.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 23 |
| White | 10 | 39 |
| Asian | 14 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs College park
- In College park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in College park at 39% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- Both Fresno and College park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 14%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 50% compared to 17% in College park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 18% compared to 7% in College park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fresno at 1% compared to 0% in College park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | College park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs College park
- More residents in Fresno report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fresno at 17.6% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fresno at 15.5% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fresno at 13.7% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fresno at 37.3% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | College park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (15,183) | 1.9% (657) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (63,519) | 6.4% (2,199) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (120,693) | 9.4% (3,210) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (81,421) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs College park
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.9% in College park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a high school diploma at 11.6% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in Fresno have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 9.4% in College park.
- In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.