Demographics details for Fresno, CA vs Aulander, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fresno, CA vs Aulander, NC.
| Data | Fresno | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 545,567 | 727 |
| Median Age | 32.1 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,001 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.6 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Fresno vs Aulander
- In Fresno, the population is higher at 545,567, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Aulander is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $63,001 compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fresno at 30.0% compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Fresno has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Aulander.
- The unemployment rate in Fresno is higher at 6.6%, compared to 6.1% in Aulander.
Demographics
Demographics Fresno vs Aulander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fresno | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 61 |
| White | 10 | 38 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 50 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fresno vs Aulander
- In Aulander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aulander at 38% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- The Asian population is larger in Fresno at 14% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fresno at 50% compared to 0% in Aulander.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fresno at 18% compared to 1% in Aulander.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fresno at 1% compared to 0% in Aulander.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fresno | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fresno vs Aulander
- In Aulander, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.7% in Fresno.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aulander at 23.5% versus 17.6% in Fresno.
- Aulander has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Aulander at 14.2% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Aulander has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 37.3% in Fresno.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fresno | Aulander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (15,183) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (63,519) | 13.3% (97) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (120,693) | 28.5% (207) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (81,421) | 2.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fresno vs Aulander
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- In Aulander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.3% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aulander at 28.5%, compared to 22.1% in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fresno hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.