Demographics details for Fremont, OH vs Oakland park, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fremont, OH vs Oakland park, FL.

Data Fremont Oakland park
Population 15,825 43,824
Median Age 35.7 years 39.1 years
Median Income $48,252 $64,989
Married Families 30.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 14% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.1

Population Comparison: Fremont vs Oakland park

  • The population in Oakland park is higher at 43,824, compared to 15,825 in Fremont.
  • The median age in Oakland park is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Fremont.
  • Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $48,252 in Fremont.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Fremont and Oakland park at 30.0%.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fremont and Oakland park at 14%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fremont is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.

Demographics

Demographics Fremont vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fremont Oakland park
Black 9 29
White 68 20
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 15 32
Two or More Races 8 17
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fremont vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 9% in Fremont.
  • Fremont has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • In Oakland park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fremont.
  • Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 15% in Fremont.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 8% in Fremont.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fremont and Oakland park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fremont Oakland park
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 12.2%
Depression 22.5% 17.8%
Smoking 22.9% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 15.0%
Obesity 44.3% 31.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fremont vs Oakland park

  • More residents in Fremont report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fremont at 22.5% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fremont at 22.9% compared to 20.1% in Oakland park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fremont at 17.4% compared to 15.0% in Oakland park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fremont at 44.3% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fremont at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fremont Oakland park
No Schooling 0.4% (57) 1.4% (596)
High School Diploma 24.8% (3,931) 19.8% (8,695)
Less than High School 10.0% (1,586) 16.2% (7,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (1,641) 20.7% (9,073)

Education Levels Comparison: Fremont vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Fremont.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fremont hold a high school diploma at 24.8% compared to 19.8% in Oakland park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland park at 16.2%, compared to 10.0% in Fremont.
  • In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 10.4% in Fremont.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.