Demographics details for Fremont, OH vs Fountain run, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fremont, OH vs Fountain run, KY.

Data Fremont Fountain run
Population 15,825 221
Median Age 35.7 years 49.1 years
Median Income $48,252 $38,750
Married Families 30.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 14% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Fremont vs Fountain run

  • In Fremont, the population is higher at 15,825, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
  • The median age in Fountain run is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 35.7 years in Fremont.
  • Fremont has a higher median income of $48,252 compared to $38,750 in Fountain run.
  • In Fountain run, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 30.0% in Fremont.
  • Fremont has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Fountain run.
  • The unemployment rate in Fremont is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.

Demographics

Demographics Fremont vs Fountain run provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fremont Fountain run
Black 9 1
White 68 99
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 15 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fremont vs Fountain run

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fremont at 9% compared to 1% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain run at 99% compared to 68% in Fremont.
  • Both Fremont and Fountain run have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fremont at 15% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fremont at 8% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fremont and Fountain run at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fremont Fountain run
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 22.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 17.4%
Depression 22.5% 30.6%
Smoking 22.9% 29.1%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 14.2%
Obesity 44.3% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fremont vs Fountain run

  • In Fountain run, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 18.0% in Fremont.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain run at 30.6% versus 22.5% in Fremont.
  • Fountain run has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 22.9% in Fremont.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fremont at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fremont at 44.3% compared to 41.1% in Fountain run.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fountain run at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Fremont.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fremont Fountain run
No Schooling 0.4% (57) 1.8% (4)
High School Diploma 24.8% (3,931) 42.1% (93)
Less than High School 10.0% (1,586) 48.9% (108)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (1,641) 10.9% (24)

Education Levels Comparison: Fremont vs Fountain run

  • In Fountain run, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Fremont.
  • In Fountain run, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.1% compared to 24.8% in Fremont.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fountain run at 48.9%, compared to 10.0% in Fremont.
  • In Fountain run, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 10.4% in Fremont.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.