Demographics details for Fremont, CA vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fremont, CA vs Garland, TX.
| Data | Fremont | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 223,871 | 240,854 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $169,023 | $71,044 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fremont vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 223,871 in Fremont.
- Residents in Fremont have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $169,023 compared to $71,044 in Garland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fremont at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 8% in Fremont.
- The unemployment rate in Fremont is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Fremont vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fremont | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 16 |
| White | 15 | 6 |
| Asian | 63 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fremont vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher percentage of White residents at 15% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Fremont at 63% compared to 11% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 12% in Fremont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 7% in Fremont.
- In Garland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fremont | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 14.3% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 20.3% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fremont vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.1% in Fremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garland at 22.2% versus 14.3% in Fremont.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 7.3% in Fremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garland at 17.6% compared to 14.3% in Fremont.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 20.3% in Fremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garland at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fremont | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (3,191) | 2.5% (6,080) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (21,668) | 13.9% (33,524) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (16,158) | 24.7% (59,406) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.0% (100,683) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fremont vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.4% in Fremont.
- In Garland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 9.7% in Fremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 7.2% in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.