Demographics details for Fremont, CA vs Everest, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fremont, CA vs Everest, KS.
Data | Fremont | Everest |
---|---|---|
Population | 223,871 | 258 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 34.5 years |
Median Income | $169,023 | $44,375 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fremont vs Everest
- In Fremont, the population is higher at 223,871, compared to 258 in Everest.
- Residents in Fremont have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 34.5 years in Everest.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $169,023 compared to $44,375 in Everest.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fremont and Everest at 50.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Everest at 11%, compared to 8% in Fremont.
- The unemployment rate in Fremont is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.5% in Everest.
Demographics
Demographics Fremont vs Everest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fremont | Everest |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 2 |
White | 15 | 90 |
Asian | 63 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fremont vs Everest
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fremont at 3% compared to 2% in Everest.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Everest at 90% compared to 15% in Fremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Fremont at 63% compared to 0% in Everest.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fremont at 12% compared to 0% in Everest.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fremont at 7% compared to 6% in Everest.
- In Everest, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fremont | Everest |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 11.2% |
Depression | 14.3% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 7.3% | 20.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 19.1% |
Obesity | 20.3% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 50.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fremont vs Everest
- In Everest, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 12.1% in Fremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Everest at 22.4% versus 14.3% in Fremont.
- Everest has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 7.3% in Fremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Everest at 19.1% compared to 14.3% in Fremont.
- Everest has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 20.3% in Fremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Everest at 50.0% compared to 7.0% in Fremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fremont | Everest |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (3,191) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.7% (21,668) | 26.4% (68) |
Less than High School | 7.2% (16,158) | 17.8% (46) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.0% (100,683) | 36.8% (95) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fremont vs Everest
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Everest.
- In Everest, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 9.7% in Fremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Everest at 17.8%, compared to 7.2% in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 36.8% in Everest.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.