Demographics details for Fremont, CA vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fremont, CA vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Fremont | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 223,871 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $169,023 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fremont vs Chickasha
- In Fremont, the population is higher at 223,871, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- Residents in Fremont have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $169,023 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fremont at 50.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 8% in Fremont.
- The unemployment rate in Fremont is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Fremont vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fremont | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 15 | 71 |
| Asian | 63 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Fremont vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Fremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 15% in Fremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Fremont at 63% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fremont at 12% compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 7% in Fremont.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Fremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fremont | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 14.3% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 20.3% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fremont vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 12.1% in Fremont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 14.3% in Fremont.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 7.3% in Fremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fremont at 14.3% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 20.3% in Fremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Fremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fremont | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (3,191) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (21,668) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (16,158) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.0% (100,683) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fremont vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 9.7% in Fremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 7.2% in Fremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.