Demographics details for Fremont, CA vs Cedarbluff, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fremont, CA vs Cedarbluff, MS.
| Data | Fremont | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 223,871 | 170 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $169,023 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fremont vs Cedarbluff
- In Fremont, the population is higher at 223,871, compared to 170 in Cedarbluff.
- The median age in Cedarbluff is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.6 years in Fremont.
- Fremont has a higher median income of $169,023 compared to $60,000 in Cedarbluff.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fremont and Cedarbluff at 50.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedarbluff at 15%, compared to 8% in Fremont.
- Cedarbluff has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.4% in Fremont.
Demographics
Demographics Fremont vs Cedarbluff provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fremont | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 25 |
| White | 15 | 70 |
| Asian | 63 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fremont vs Cedarbluff
- In Cedarbluff, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 3% in Fremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedarbluff at 70% compared to 15% in Fremont.
- The Asian population is larger in Fremont at 63% compared to 1% in Cedarbluff.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fremont at 12% compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fremont at 7% compared to 2% in Cedarbluff.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fremont and Cedarbluff at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fremont | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 20.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fremont vs Cedarbluff
- More residents in Fremont report poor mental health at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fremont at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fremont at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fremont at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fremont at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fremont at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fremont | Cedarbluff |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (3,191) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (21,668) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (16,158) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.0% (100,683) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fremont vs Cedarbluff
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont hold a high school diploma at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- More residents in Fremont have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fremont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedarbluff.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.