Demographics details for Freeport, MN vs Union city, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, MN vs Union city, PA.
| Data | Freeport | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 677 | 2,887 |
| Median Age | 29.9 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $91,250 | $41,764 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Freeport vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 2,887, compared to 677 in Freeport.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher median income of $91,250 compared to $41,764 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeport at 53.0% compared to 40.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 12%, compared to 5% in Freeport.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.5% in Freeport.
Demographics
Demographics Freeport vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeport | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Union city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Freeport at 2% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union city at 91% compared to 82% in Freeport.
- Both Freeport and Union city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Freeport at 12% compared to 4% in Union city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 5%, compared to 4% in Freeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Freeport and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeport | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Union city
- In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Freeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union city at 24.6% versus 23.7% in Freeport.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 17.2% in Freeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 17.8% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeport at 39.9% compared to 39.2% in Union city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 21.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeport | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.3% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (135) | 42.5% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 9.2% (62) | 16.5% (476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (118) | 8.2% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Union city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Freeport and Union city at 0.3%.
- In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.5% compared to 19.9% in Freeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union city at 16.5%, compared to 9.2% in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 8.2% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.