Demographics details for Freeport, MN vs Smith center, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, MN vs Smith center, KS.
| Data | Freeport | Smith center |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 677 | 1,561 |
| Median Age | 29.9 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $91,250 | $49,444 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Freeport vs Smith center
- The population in Smith center is higher at 1,561, compared to 677 in Freeport.
- The median age in Smith center is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher median income of $91,250 compared to $49,444 in Smith center.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeport at 53.0% compared to 43.0% in Smith center.
- The poverty level is higher in Smith center at 10%, compared to 5% in Freeport.
- Smith center has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Freeport.
Demographics
Demographics Freeport vs Smith center provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeport | Smith center |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 82 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Smith center
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Freeport at 2% compared to 1% in Smith center.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Smith center at 94% compared to 82% in Freeport.
- Both Freeport and Smith center have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Freeport at 12% compared to 3% in Smith center.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Freeport at 4% compared to 2% in Smith center.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Freeport and Smith center at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeport | Smith center |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.3% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Smith center
- In Smith center, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Freeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeport at 23.7% compared to 21.7% in Smith center.
- Smith center has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 17.2% in Freeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 19.0% in Smith center.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeport at 39.9% compared to 38.8% in Smith center.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Smith center at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeport | Smith center |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (135) | 29.4% (459) |
| Less than High School | 9.2% (62) | 7.6% (118) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (118) | 14.8% (231) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Smith center
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Smith center.
- In Smith center, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.4% compared to 19.9% in Freeport.
- More residents in Freeport have less than a high school education at 9.2% compared to 7.6% in Smith center.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 14.8% in Smith center.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.