Demographics details for Freeport, MN vs Santa fe springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, MN vs Santa fe springs, CA.

Data Freeport Santa fe springs
Population 677 18,439
Median Age 29.9 years 38.0 years
Median Income $91,250 $81,500
Married Families 53.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 5.5

Population Comparison: Freeport vs Santa fe springs

  • The population in Santa fe springs is higher at 18,439, compared to 677 in Freeport.
  • The median age in Santa fe springs is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 29.9 years in Freeport.
  • Freeport has a higher median income of $91,250 compared to $81,500 in Santa fe springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeport at 53.0% compared to 37.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Santa fe springs at 10%, compared to 5% in Freeport.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 2.5% in Freeport.

Demographics

Demographics Freeport vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Freeport Santa fe springs
Black 2 4
White 82 -5
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic 12 75
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Freeport.
  • Freeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Freeport.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 12% in Freeport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa fe springs at 15%, compared to 4% in Freeport.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Freeport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Freeport Santa fe springs
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 11.7%
Depression 23.7% 15.1%
Smoking 17.2% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 23.3% 15.7%
Obesity 39.9% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Santa fe springs

  • More residents in Freeport report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Freeport at 23.7% compared to 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Freeport at 17.2% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Freeport at 23.3% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Freeport at 39.9% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Santa fe springs at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Freeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Freeport Santa fe springs
No Schooling 0.3% (2) 3.5% (644)
High School Diploma 19.9% (135) 16.3% (3,011)
Less than High School 9.2% (62) 26.5% (4,883)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.4% (118) 15.5% (2,850)

Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.3% in Freeport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 9.2% in Freeport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Santa fe springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.