Demographics details for Freeport, IL vs Tuscaloosa, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, IL vs Tuscaloosa, AL.
| Data | Freeport | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,413 | 110,602 |
| Median Age | 43.4 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $44,658 | $47,257 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Freeport vs Tuscaloosa
- The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 23,413 in Freeport.
- Residents in Freeport have a higher median age of 43.4 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher median income of $47,257, compared to $44,658 in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeport at 35.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 0% in Freeport.
- The unemployment rate in Freeport is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.5% in Tuscaloosa.
Demographics
Demographics Freeport vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeport | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 41 |
| White | 68 | 49 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 14% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
- In Tuscaloosa, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Freeport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Freeport at 6% compared to 4% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Freeport at 10% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Freeport and Tuscaloosa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeport | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.0% in Freeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeport at 22.3% compared to 21.9% in Tuscaloosa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Freeport at 20.6% compared to 19.6% in Tuscaloosa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeport at 15.9% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 40.8% in Freeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Freeport at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeport | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (206) | 0.7% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (4,646) | 12.5% (13,878) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,845) | 6.1% (6,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (3,011) | 20.3% (22,425) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Tuscaloosa
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Tuscaloosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents in Freeport have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 6.1% in Tuscaloosa.
- In Tuscaloosa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 12.9% in Freeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.