Demographics details for Freeport, IL vs South cle elum, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, IL vs South cle elum, WA.

Data Freeport South cle elum
Population 23,413 564
Median Age 43.4 years 35.2 years
Median Income $44,658 $56,400
Married Families 35.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.9 5.0

Population Comparison: Freeport vs South cle elum

  • In Freeport, the population is higher at 23,413, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • Residents in Freeport have a higher median age of 43.4 years compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher median income of $56,400, compared to $44,658 in Freeport.
  • In South cle elum, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Freeport.
  • The poverty level is higher in South cle elum at 10%, compared to 0% in Freeport.
  • The unemployment rate in Freeport is higher at 6.9%, compared to 5.0% in South cle elum.

Demographics

Demographics Freeport vs South cle elum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Freeport South cle elum
Black 14 Data is updating
White 68 84
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 10 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Freeport at 14% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South cle elum at 84% compared to 68% in Freeport.
  • The Asian population is larger in Freeport at 2% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Freeport and South cle elum at 6%.
  • Both Freeport and South cle elum have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 10%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Freeport and South cle elum at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Freeport South cle elum
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 11.9%
Depression 22.3% 26.2%
Smoking 20.6% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 18.3%
Obesity 40.8% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs South cle elum

  • More residents in Freeport report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.8% in South cle elum.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South cle elum at 26.2% versus 22.3% in Freeport.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Freeport at 20.6% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 15.9% in Freeport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Freeport at 40.8% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Freeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Freeport South cle elum
No Schooling 0.9% (206) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.8% (4,646) 22.2% (125)
Less than High School 12.2% (2,845) 21.6% (122)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.9% (3,011) 20.6% (116)

Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of residents in Freeport have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • In South cle elum, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 19.8% in Freeport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South cle elum at 21.6%, compared to 12.2% in Freeport.
  • In South cle elum, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 12.9% in Freeport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.