Demographics details for Freeport, IL vs Roseville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, IL vs Roseville, CA.
| Data | Freeport | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,413 | 154,817 |
| Median Age | 43.4 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $44,658 | $112,265 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Freeport vs Roseville
- The population in Roseville is higher at 154,817, compared to 23,413 in Freeport.
- Residents in Freeport have a higher median age of 43.4 years compared to 39.8 years in Roseville.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $112,265, compared to $44,658 in Freeport.
- In Roseville, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Freeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Roseville at 8%, compared to 0% in Freeport.
- The unemployment rate in Freeport is higher at 6.9%, compared to 4.1% in Roseville.
Demographics
Demographics Freeport vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeport | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 2 |
| White | 68 | 61 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Roseville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Freeport at 14% compared to 2% in Roseville.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 61% in Roseville.
- In Roseville, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Freeport.
- Roseville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in Freeport.
- Both Freeport and Roseville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 10%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Freeport and Roseville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeport | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 26.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Roseville
- More residents in Freeport report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.3% in Roseville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeport at 22.3% compared to 19.2% in Roseville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Freeport at 20.6% compared to 10.5% in Roseville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roseville at 18.1% compared to 15.9% in Freeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeport at 40.8% compared to 26.4% in Roseville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Freeport at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Roseville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeport | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (206) | 0.7% (1,136) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (4,646) | 9.2% (14,170) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (2,845) | 5.4% (8,299) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (3,011) | 29.7% (45,932) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Roseville
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 9.2% in Roseville.
- More residents in Freeport have less than a high school education at 12.2% compared to 5.4% in Roseville.
- In Roseville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 12.9% in Freeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.