Demographics details for Freeland, WA vs Spring city, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, WA vs Spring city, PA.
| Data | Freeland | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,894 | 3,495 |
| Median Age | 51.2 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $89,868 | $70,181 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Spring city
- The population in Spring city is higher at 3,495, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 36.7 years in Spring city.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $89,868 compared to $70,181 in Spring city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Spring city.
- The poverty level is identical in both Freeland and Spring city at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Spring city.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Spring city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Spring city
- In Spring city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 85% in Spring city.
- In Spring city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Freeland.
- Spring city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Freeland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Freeland at 6% compared to 3% in Spring city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Spring city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Spring city
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Freeland and Spring city at 15.8%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeland at 25.5% compared to 23.0% in Spring city.
- Spring city has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 11.8% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring city at 18.9% compared to 18.0% in Freeland.
- Spring city has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring city at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (153) | 17.5% (613) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (164) | 8.8% (309) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (548) | 28.0% (980) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Spring city
- In Spring city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- In Spring city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring city at 8.8%, compared to 8.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 28.0% in Spring city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.