Demographics details for Freeland, WA vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, WA vs Spanish fork, UT.
| Data | Freeland | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,894 | 44,102 |
| Median Age | 51.2 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $89,868 | $93,989 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $89,868 in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
- The poverty level is higher in Spanish fork at 6%, compared to 5% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 80 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Freeland at 3% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- The Asian population is larger in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 6% in Freeland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 7.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 8.3% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Freeland report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeland at 25.5% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Freeland at 11.8% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 18.0% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Spanish fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (175) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (153) | 9.1% (4,010) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (164) | 5.9% (2,583) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (548) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- More residents in Freeland have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.