Demographics details for Freeland, WA vs South salt lake, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, WA vs South salt lake, UT.
| Data | Freeland | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,894 | 26,003 |
| Median Age | 51.2 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $89,868 | $57,125 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs South salt lake
- The population in South salt lake is higher at 26,003, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $89,868 compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 44.0% compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
- The poverty level is higher in South salt lake at 10%, compared to 5% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.4% in South salt lake.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs South salt lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 86 | 43 |
| Asian | 1 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 43% in South salt lake.
- In South salt lake, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Freeland.
- South salt lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South salt lake at 9%, compared to 6% in Freeland.
- In South salt lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Freeland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South salt lake at 26.6% versus 25.5% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Freeland at 11.8% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 18.0% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
- South salt lake has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in South salt lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | South salt lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.4% (374) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (153) | 16.1% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (164) | 16.8% (4,371) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (548) | 18.9% (4,906) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs South salt lake
- In South salt lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- In South salt lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South salt lake at 16.8%, compared to 8.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 18.9% in South salt lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.