Demographics details for Freeland, WA vs Lees summit, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, WA vs Lees summit, MO.
| Data | Freeland | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,894 | 103,465 |
| Median Age | 51.2 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $89,868 | $103,447 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Lees summit
- The population in Lees summit is higher at 103,465, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 38.6 years in Lees summit.
- Lees summit has a higher median income of $103,447, compared to $89,868 in Freeland.
- In Lees summit, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Freeland.
- The poverty level is identical in both Freeland and Lees summit at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.3% in Lees summit.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Lees summit provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | 86 | 78 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Lees summit
- In Lees summit, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 78% in Lees summit.
- In Lees summit, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Freeland.
- Lees summit has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Freeland.
- Both Freeland and Lees summit have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Lees summit.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Lees summit
- In Lees summit, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeland at 25.5% compared to 21.8% in Lees summit.
- Lees summit has a higher smoking rate at 13.1% compared to 11.8% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lees summit at 21.7% compared to 18.0% in Freeland.
- Lees summit has higher obesity rates at 33.2% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Lees summit.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Lees summit |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (298) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (153) | 11.1% (11,521) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (164) | 3.2% (3,308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (548) | 32.3% (33,401) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Lees summit
- In Lees summit, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- In Lees summit, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.1% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- More residents in Freeland have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 3.2% in Lees summit.
- In Lees summit, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 28.9% in Freeland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.