Demographics details for Freeland, WA vs Lake arthur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, WA vs Lake arthur, LA.
Data | Freeland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,894 | 2,594 |
Median Age | 51.2 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $89,868 | $43,625 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Lake arthur
- The population in Lake arthur is higher at 2,594, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 36.0 years in Lake arthur.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $89,868 compared to $43,625 in Lake arthur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Lake arthur.
- The poverty level is higher in Lake arthur at 13%, compared to 5% in Freeland.
- Lake arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.1% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Lake arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Freeland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 7 |
White | 86 | 83 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 3% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 83% in Lake arthur.
- The Asian population is larger in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Lake arthur.
- Lake arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Freeland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Freeland at 6% compared to 3% in Lake arthur.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Lake arthur.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Freeland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 14.5% |
Depression | 25.5% | 28.6% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 29.6% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lake arthur at 28.6% versus 25.5% in Freeland.
- Lake arthur has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 11.8% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake arthur at 18.2% compared to 18.0% in Freeland.
- Lake arthur has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake arthur at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Freeland | Lake arthur |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (39) |
High School Diploma | 8.1% (153) | 18.9% (490) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (164) | 35.5% (920) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (548) | 5.7% (149) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Lake arthur
- In Lake arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- In Lake arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lake arthur at 35.5%, compared to 8.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 5.7% in Lake arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.