Demographics details for Freeland, WA vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, WA vs Cedar park, TX.
| Data | Freeland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,894 | 77,642 |
| Median Age | 51.2 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $89,868 | $118,903 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 51.2 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $89,868 in Freeland.
- In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Freeland.
- The poverty level is identical in both Freeland and Cedar park at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 86 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Cedar park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Freeland and Cedar park at 3%.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Freeland.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 3% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 6% in Freeland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 29.6% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Cedar park
- More residents in Freeland report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeland at 25.5% compared to 24.1% in Cedar park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Freeland at 11.8% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Cedar park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (153) | 8.9% (6,896) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (164) | 4.1% (3,156) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.9% (548) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
- In Cedar park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.9% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
- More residents in Freeland have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 28.9% in Freeland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.