Demographics details for Freeland, MI vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, MI vs Woodstock, GA.
| Data | Freeland | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,357 | 37,350 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $95,478 | $100,913 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $95,478 in Freeland.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Freeland.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 5%, compared to 4% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 11 |
| White | 76 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 9% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Freeland.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Freeland.
- Both Freeland and Woodstock have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Woodstock
- More residents in Freeland report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 20.8% versus 20.4% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Freeland at 14.2% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeland at 37.8% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 9.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (51) | 0.3% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (1,014) | 8.2% (3,052) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (542) | 3.7% (1,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (1,605) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Freeland have less than a high school education at 7.4% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 21.8% in Freeland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.