Demographics details for Freeland, MI vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, MI vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Freeland | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,357 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $95,478 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Live oak
- In Freeland, the population is higher at 7,357, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Live oak.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 4% in Freeland.
- Live oak has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 38 |
| White | 76 | 41 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 9% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 8% in Freeland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeland at 20.4% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeland at 37.8% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Live oak at 12.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (51) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (1,014) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (542) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (1,605) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Live oak
- In Live oak, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Live oak at 11.3%, compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.