Demographics details for Freeland, MI vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, MI vs Lancaster, VA.
| Data | Freeland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,357 | 10,750 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 59.2 years |
| Median Income | $95,478 | $62,674 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 10,750, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478 compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 39.0% in Freeland.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 4% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Freeland is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 28 |
| White | 76 | 66 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 9% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
- Both Freeland and Lancaster have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Freeland at 5% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Freeland at 8% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.2% versus 20.4% in Freeland.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeland at 37.8% compared to 37.3% in Lancaster.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (51) | 1.5% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (1,014) | 20.9% (2,244) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (542) | 17.0% (1,823) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (1,605) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 17.0%, compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 21.8% in Freeland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.