Demographics details for Freeland, MI vs Glendale, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, MI vs Glendale, AZ.
| Data | Freeland | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,357 | 252,136 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,478 | $66,375 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Glendale
- The population in Glendale is higher at 252,136, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- Residents in Freeland have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478 compared to $66,375 in Glendale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Glendale.
- The poverty level is higher in Glendale at 11%, compared to 4% in Freeland.
- Glendale has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Glendale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeland | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 7 |
| White | 76 | 28 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 19 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Glendale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Freeland at 9% compared to 7% in Glendale.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 28% in Glendale.
- In Glendale, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Freeland.
- Glendale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 5% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glendale at 19%, compared to 8% in Freeland.
- In Glendale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Freeland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeland | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 20.2% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Glendale
- In Glendale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeland at 20.4% compared to 20.2% in Glendale.
- Glendale has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 16.8% in Glendale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Freeland at 37.8% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Glendale at 13.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeland | Glendale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (51) | 1.7% (4,190) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (1,014) | 14.7% (37,119) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (542) | 18.6% (46,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (1,605) | 14.2% (35,878) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Glendale
- In Glendale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- In Glendale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Glendale at 18.6%, compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 14.2% in Glendale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.