Demographics details for Fredericksburg, VA vs Rutherford, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fredericksburg, VA vs Rutherford, NJ.

Data Fredericksburg Rutherford
Population 28,757 18,662
Median Age 30.9 years 40.5 years
Median Income $83,445 $128,576
Married Families 30.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.4

Population Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Rutherford

  • In Fredericksburg, the population is higher at 28,757, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
  • The median age in Rutherford is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fredericksburg.
  • Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $83,445 in Fredericksburg.
  • In Rutherford, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Fredericksburg.
  • Fredericksburg has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Rutherford.
  • The unemployment rate in Fredericksburg is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.

Demographics

Demographics Fredericksburg vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fredericksburg Rutherford
Black 21 3
White 54 49
Asian 4 16
Hispanic 12 21
Two or More Races 9 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Rutherford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fredericksburg at 21% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
  • Fredericksburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
  • In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 4% in Fredericksburg.
  • Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 12% in Fredericksburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 9% in Fredericksburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fredericksburg and Rutherford at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fredericksburg Rutherford
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 7.8%
Depression 22.7% 17.0%
Smoking 15.2% 10.8%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 17.6%
Obesity 36.7% 24.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Rutherford

  • More residents in Fredericksburg report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fredericksburg at 22.7% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fredericksburg at 15.2% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 16.2% in Fredericksburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fredericksburg at 36.7% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fredericksburg at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fredericksburg Rutherford
No Schooling 0.5% (140) 0.9% (161)
High School Diploma 10.6% (3,055) 12.4% (2,318)
Less than High School 7.2% (2,074) 6.3% (1,175)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.5% (7,346) 38.9% (7,259)

Education Levels Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Rutherford

  • In Rutherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Fredericksburg.
  • In Rutherford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.4% compared to 10.6% in Fredericksburg.
  • More residents in Fredericksburg have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
  • In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 25.5% in Fredericksburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.