Demographics details for Fredericksburg, TX vs Beaverdam, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fredericksburg, TX vs Beaverdam, VA.

Data Fredericksburg Beaverdam
Population 11,257 14,809
Median Age 50.7 years 45.4 years
Median Income $56,858 $110,208
Married Families 44.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.0

Population Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Beaverdam

  • The population in Beaverdam is higher at 14,809, compared to 11,257 in Fredericksburg.
  • Residents in Fredericksburg have a higher median age of 50.7 years compared to 45.4 years in Beaverdam.
  • Beaverdam has a higher median income of $110,208, compared to $56,858 in Fredericksburg.
  • In Beaverdam, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 44.0% in Fredericksburg.
  • Fredericksburg has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Beaverdam.
  • The unemployment rate in Fredericksburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Beaverdam.

Demographics

Demographics Fredericksburg vs Beaverdam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fredericksburg Beaverdam
Black 1 9
White 71 78
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 20 6
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Beaverdam

  • In Beaverdam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Fredericksburg.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaverdam at 78% compared to 71% in Fredericksburg.
  • In Beaverdam, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fredericksburg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fredericksburg at 20% compared to 6% in Beaverdam.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverdam at 6%, compared to 5% in Fredericksburg.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fredericksburg at 3% compared to 0% in Beaverdam.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fredericksburg Beaverdam
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% Data is updating%
Depression 23.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 34.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Beaverdam

  • More residents in Fredericksburg report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fredericksburg at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fredericksburg at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fredericksburg at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fredericksburg at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fredericksburg at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Beaverdam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fredericksburg Beaverdam
No Schooling 0.8% (94) 1.0% (151)
High School Diploma 14.8% (1,668) 16.6% (2,455)
Less than High School 13.7% (1,546) 7.5% (1,117)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.5% (3,094) 33.8% (5,006)

Education Levels Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Beaverdam

  • In Beaverdam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Fredericksburg.
  • In Beaverdam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 14.8% in Fredericksburg.
  • More residents in Fredericksburg have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 7.5% in Beaverdam.
  • In Beaverdam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 27.5% in Fredericksburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.