Demographics details for Franklinton, LA vs Sitka, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklinton, LA vs Sitka, AK.
| Data | Franklinton | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,593 | 8,382 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $31,645 | $95,261 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Franklinton vs Sitka
- The population in Sitka is higher at 8,382, compared to 3,593 in Franklinton.
- The median age is the same in both Franklinton and Sitka at 39.5 years.
- Sitka has a higher median income of $95,261, compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
- In Sitka, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
- Franklinton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- The unemployment rate in Franklinton is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.3% in Sitka.
Demographics
Demographics Franklinton vs Sitka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Franklinton | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 54 | 1 |
| White | 41 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Franklinton vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklinton at 54% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sitka at 57% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
- In Sitka, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Franklinton.
- Sitka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Franklinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sitka at 18%, compared to 4% in Franklinton.
- In Sitka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 0% in Franklinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Franklinton | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 27.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 46.9% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklinton vs Sitka
- More residents in Franklinton report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklinton at 25.8% compared to 18.7% in Sitka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklinton at 27.5% compared to 16.4% in Sitka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 14.8% in Franklinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklinton at 46.9% compared to 31.7% in Sitka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 13.0% in Sitka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Franklinton | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (30) | 0.4% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 23.5% (844) | 16.7% (1,396) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (737) | 5.8% (486) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (187) | 24.8% (2,076) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklinton vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Sitka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 16.7% in Sitka.
- More residents in Franklinton have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.