Demographics details for Franklinton, LA vs Severna park, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Franklinton, LA vs Severna park, MD.

Data Franklinton Severna park
Population 3,593 40,452
Median Age 39.5 years 41.5 years
Median Income $31,645 $164,288
Married Families 26.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 19% 3%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Franklinton vs Severna park

  • The population in Severna park is higher at 40,452, compared to 3,593 in Franklinton.
  • The median age in Severna park is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 39.5 years in Franklinton.
  • Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288, compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
  • In Severna park, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
  • Franklinton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 3% in Severna park.
  • The unemployment rate in Franklinton is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Severna park.

Demographics

Demographics Franklinton vs Severna park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Franklinton Severna park
Black 54 3
White 41 86
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 1 3
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Franklinton vs Severna park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklinton at 54% compared to 3% in Severna park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Severna park at 86% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
  • In Severna park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Franklinton.
  • Severna park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Franklinton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Severna park at 5%, compared to 4% in Franklinton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklinton and Severna park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Franklinton Severna park
Mental Health Not Good 21.7% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.6% 7.3%
Depression 25.8% 19.9%
Smoking 27.5% 9.0%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 18.4%
Obesity 46.9% 31.9%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Franklinton vs Severna park

  • More residents in Franklinton report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Franklinton at 25.8% compared to 19.9% in Severna park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Franklinton at 27.5% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 14.8% in Franklinton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Franklinton at 46.9% compared to 31.9% in Severna park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Franklinton Severna park
No Schooling 0.8% (30) 0.4% (145)
High School Diploma 23.5% (844) 10.9% (4,392)
Less than High School 20.5% (737) 4.3% (1,731)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.2% (187) 38.1% (15,411)

Education Levels Comparison: Franklinton vs Severna park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Severna park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
  • More residents in Franklinton have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
  • In Severna park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.