Demographics details for Franklinton, LA vs Richton, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklinton, LA vs Richton, MS.
| Data | Franklinton | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,593 | 902 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $31,645 | $33,621 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Franklinton vs Richton
- In Franklinton, the population is higher at 3,593, compared to 902 in Richton.
- The median age in Richton is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 39.5 years in Franklinton.
- Richton has a higher median income of $33,621, compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
- In Richton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
- Franklinton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 16% in Richton.
- The unemployment rate in Franklinton is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Richton.
Demographics
Demographics Franklinton vs Richton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Franklinton | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 54 | 32 |
| White | 41 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Franklinton vs Richton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklinton at 54% compared to 32% in Richton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richton at 68% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
- Both Franklinton and Richton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Franklinton at 1% compared to 0% in Richton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Franklinton at 4% compared to 0% in Richton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklinton and Richton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Franklinton | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 27.5% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 46.9% | 42.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklinton vs Richton
- More residents in Franklinton report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 19.1% in Richton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklinton at 25.8% compared to 24.4% in Richton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklinton at 27.5% compared to 24.2% in Richton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Franklinton at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in Richton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklinton at 46.9% compared to 42.8% in Richton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 24.0% in Richton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Franklinton | Richton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (30) | 4.2% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 23.5% (844) | 26.9% (243) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (737) | 19.7% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (187) | 15.2% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklinton vs Richton
- In Richton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.8% in Franklinton.
- In Richton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 23.5% in Franklinton.
- More residents in Franklinton have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 19.7% in Richton.
- In Richton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.