Demographics details for Franklinton, LA vs Kimmell, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Franklinton, LA vs Kimmell, IN.

Data Franklinton Kimmell
Population 3,593 453
Median Age 39.5 years 37.4 years
Median Income $31,645 $36,667
Married Families 26.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 19% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Franklinton vs Kimmell

  • In Franklinton, the population is higher at 3,593, compared to 453 in Kimmell.
  • Residents in Franklinton have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 37.4 years in Kimmell.
  • Kimmell has a higher median income of $36,667, compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
  • In Kimmell, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
  • Franklinton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 8% in Kimmell.
  • The unemployment rate in Franklinton is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Kimmell.

Demographics

Demographics Franklinton vs Kimmell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Franklinton Kimmell
Black 54 Data is updating
White 41 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Franklinton vs Kimmell

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklinton at 54% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Kimmell at 100% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
  • Both Franklinton and Kimmell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Franklinton at 1% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Franklinton at 4% compared to 0% in Kimmell.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklinton and Kimmell at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Franklinton Kimmell
Mental Health Not Good 21.7% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 16.6% 11.3%
Depression 25.8% 26.2%
Smoking 27.5% 19.2%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 17.4%
Obesity 46.9% 39.8%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Franklinton vs Kimmell

  • More residents in Franklinton report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 16.7% in Kimmell.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kimmell at 26.2% versus 25.8% in Franklinton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Franklinton at 27.5% compared to 19.2% in Kimmell.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Kimmell at 17.4% compared to 14.8% in Franklinton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Franklinton at 46.9% compared to 39.8% in Kimmell.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 18.0% in Kimmell.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Franklinton Kimmell
No Schooling 0.8% (30) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.5% (844) 28.7% (130)
Less than High School 20.5% (737) 41.5% (188)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.2% (187) 2.0% (9)

Education Levels Comparison: Franklinton vs Kimmell

  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Kimmell.
  • In Kimmell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 23.5% in Franklinton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kimmell at 41.5%, compared to 20.5% in Franklinton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.2% compared to 2.0% in Kimmell.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.