Demographics details for Franklinton, LA vs Fountain run, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Franklinton, LA vs Fountain run, KY.

Data Franklinton Fountain run
Population 3,593 221
Median Age 39.5 years 49.1 years
Median Income $31,645 $38,750
Married Families 26.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 19% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Franklinton vs Fountain run

  • In Franklinton, the population is higher at 3,593, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
  • The median age in Fountain run is higher at 49.1 years, compared to 39.5 years in Franklinton.
  • Fountain run has a higher median income of $38,750, compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
  • In Fountain run, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
  • Franklinton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 12% in Fountain run.
  • The unemployment rate in Franklinton is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.

Demographics

Demographics Franklinton vs Fountain run provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Franklinton Fountain run
Black 54 1
White 41 99
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Franklinton vs Fountain run

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklinton at 54% compared to 1% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain run at 99% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
  • Both Franklinton and Fountain run have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Franklinton at 1% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Franklinton at 4% compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklinton and Fountain run at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Franklinton Fountain run
Mental Health Not Good 21.7% 22.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.6% 17.4%
Depression 25.8% 30.6%
Smoking 27.5% 29.1%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 14.2%
Obesity 46.9% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Franklinton vs Fountain run

  • In Fountain run, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 21.7% in Franklinton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain run at 30.6% versus 25.8% in Franklinton.
  • Fountain run has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 27.5% in Franklinton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Franklinton at 14.8% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Franklinton at 46.9% compared to 41.1% in Fountain run.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 24.0% in Fountain run.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Franklinton Fountain run
No Schooling 0.8% (30) 1.8% (4)
High School Diploma 23.5% (844) 42.1% (93)
Less than High School 20.5% (737) 48.9% (108)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.2% (187) 10.9% (24)

Education Levels Comparison: Franklinton vs Fountain run

  • In Fountain run, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Franklinton.
  • In Fountain run, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.1% compared to 23.5% in Franklinton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fountain run at 48.9%, compared to 20.5% in Franklinton.
  • In Fountain run, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.