Demographics details for Franklin, WI vs Lansing, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin, WI vs Lansing, MI.
| Data | Franklin | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,066 | 112,537 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $100,524 | $50,747 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.4 |
Population Comparison: Franklin vs Lansing
- The population in Lansing is higher at 112,537, compared to 36,066 in Franklin.
- Residents in Franklin have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Franklin has a higher median income of $100,524 compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Franklin at 50.0% compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- The poverty level is higher in Lansing at 19%, compared to 5% in Franklin.
- Lansing has a higher unemployment rate at 7.4% compared to 3.2% in Franklin.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin vs Lansing provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Franklin | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 24 |
| White | 80 | 48 |
| Asian | 6 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin vs Lansing
- In Lansing, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 4% in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- The Asian population is larger in Franklin at 6% compared to 5% in Lansing.
- Lansing has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 6% in Franklin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lansing at 10%, compared to 4% in Franklin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklin and Lansing at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Franklin | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 12.8% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 27.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.4% in Franklin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lansing at 26.3% versus 21.9% in Franklin.
- Lansing has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 12.8% in Franklin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Franklin at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 30.9% in Franklin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lansing at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Franklin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Franklin | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (98) | 1.3% (1,419) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (5,595) | 13.5% (15,216) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (2,462) | 10.0% (11,269) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (11,484) | 19.3% (21,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lansing at 10.0%, compared to 6.8% in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 19.3% in Lansing.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.