Demographics details for Franklin, IN vs Union grove, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin, IN vs Union grove, AL.
Data | Franklin | Union grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,728 | 69 |
Median Age | 34.4 years | 52.9 years |
Median Income | $72,344 | $81,875 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Franklin vs Union grove
- In Franklin, the population is higher at 25,728, compared to 69 in Union grove.
- The median age in Union grove is higher at 52.9 years, compared to 34.4 years in Franklin.
- Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875, compared to $72,344 in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Franklin at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
- Franklin has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Union grove.
- The unemployment rate in Franklin is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Union grove.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin vs Union grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Franklin | Union grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 1 |
White | 87 | 95 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin vs Union grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklin at 4% compared to 1% in Union grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union grove at 95% compared to 87% in Franklin.
- The Asian population is larger in Franklin at 1% compared to 0% in Union grove.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Franklin and Union grove at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Franklin at 5% compared to 1% in Union grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklin and Union grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Franklin | Union grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.9% |
Depression | 28.9% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 41.6% | 31.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin vs Union grove
- More residents in Franklin report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Union grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklin at 28.9% compared to 22.6% in Union grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklin at 19.2% compared to 15.7% in Union grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union grove at 18.1% compared to 16.9% in Franklin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklin at 41.6% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 12.0% in Franklin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Franklin | Union grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (148) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.1% (4,910) | 40.6% (28) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (2,296) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,460) | 11.6% (8) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin vs Union grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- In Union grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 40.6% compared to 19.1% in Franklin.
- More residents in Franklin have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.