Demographics details for Franklin, IN vs Silverhill, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin, IN vs Silverhill, AL.
Data | Franklin | Silverhill |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,728 | 1,369 |
Median Age | 34.4 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $72,344 | $58,510 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Franklin vs Silverhill
- In Franklin, the population is higher at 25,728, compared to 1,369 in Silverhill.
- The median age in Silverhill is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 34.4 years in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher median income of $72,344 compared to $58,510 in Silverhill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Franklin at 38.0% compared to 26.0% in Silverhill.
- The poverty level is higher in Silverhill at 10%, compared to 9% in Franklin.
- The unemployment rate in Franklin is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Silverhill.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin vs Silverhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Franklin | Silverhill |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 87 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin vs Silverhill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklin at 4% compared to 0% in Silverhill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Silverhill at 90% compared to 87% in Franklin.
- The Asian population is larger in Franklin at 1% compared to 0% in Silverhill.
- Silverhill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Franklin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Franklin at 5% compared to 2% in Silverhill.
- In Silverhill, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Franklin | Silverhill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.1% |
Depression | 28.9% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 41.6% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin vs Silverhill
- In Silverhill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklin at 28.9% compared to 24.9% in Silverhill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklin at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Silverhill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Silverhill at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Franklin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklin at 41.6% compared to 38.2% in Silverhill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Franklin at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Silverhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Franklin | Silverhill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (148) | 2.0% (28) |
High School Diploma | 19.1% (4,910) | 10.1% (138) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (2,296) | 5.4% (74) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,460) | 11.5% (157) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin vs Silverhill
- In Silverhill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 10.1% in Silverhill.
- More residents in Franklin have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 5.4% in Silverhill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 11.5% in Silverhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.