Demographics details for Franklin, IN vs Breckenridge, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin, IN vs Breckenridge, TX.
Data | Franklin | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,728 | 5,177 |
Median Age | 34.4 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $72,344 | $38,500 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Franklin vs Breckenridge
- In Franklin, the population is higher at 25,728, compared to 5,177 in Breckenridge.
- The median age in Breckenridge is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 34.4 years in Franklin.
- Franklin has a higher median income of $72,344 compared to $38,500 in Breckenridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Franklin at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Breckenridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Breckenridge at 15%, compared to 9% in Franklin.
- Breckenridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Franklin.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin vs Breckenridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Franklin | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 3 |
White | 87 | 42 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin vs Breckenridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklin at 4% compared to 3% in Breckenridge.
- Franklin has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 42% in Breckenridge.
- In Breckenridge, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Franklin.
- Breckenridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 3% in Franklin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Breckenridge at 13%, compared to 5% in Franklin.
- In Breckenridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Franklin | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.2% |
Depression | 28.9% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 41.6% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.7% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklin at 28.9% compared to 25.6% in Breckenridge.
- Breckenridge has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 19.2% in Franklin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Breckenridge at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Franklin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklin at 41.6% compared to 38.0% in Breckenridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Breckenridge at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Franklin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Franklin | Breckenridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (148) | 2.4% (126) |
High School Diploma | 19.1% (4,910) | 14.7% (763) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (2,296) | 26.3% (1,361) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,460) | 9.2% (477) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin vs Breckenridge
- In Breckenridge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.6% in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 14.7% in Breckenridge.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Breckenridge at 26.3%, compared to 8.9% in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 9.2% in Breckenridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.