Demographics details for Franklin, GA vs Sierra vista, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin, GA vs Sierra vista, AZ.
Data | Franklin | Sierra vista |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,128 | 45,439 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $52,597 | $70,899 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Franklin vs Sierra vista
- The population in Sierra vista is higher at 45,439, compared to 24,128 in Franklin.
- Residents in Franklin have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 37.0 years in Sierra vista.
- Sierra vista has a higher median income of $70,899, compared to $52,597 in Franklin.
- In Sierra vista, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 39.0% in Franklin.
- The poverty level is identical in both Franklin and Sierra vista at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Franklin is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.0% in Sierra vista.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin vs Sierra vista provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Franklin | Sierra vista |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 8 |
White | 81 | 48 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 5 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin vs Sierra vista
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklin at 9% compared to 8% in Sierra vista.
- Franklin has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 48% in Sierra vista.
- In Sierra vista, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Franklin.
- Sierra vista has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 5% in Franklin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sierra vista at 15%, compared to 3% in Franklin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklin and Sierra vista at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Franklin | Sierra vista |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.8% |
Depression | 23.4% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 32.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin vs Sierra vista
- More residents in Franklin report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.4% in Sierra vista.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklin at 23.4% compared to 20.8% in Sierra vista.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklin at 19.9% compared to 15.8% in Sierra vista.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sierra vista at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Franklin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklin at 37.7% compared to 32.2% in Sierra vista.
- Disability percentages are higher in Franklin at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Sierra vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Franklin | Sierra vista |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (394) | 0.5% (224) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (3,969) | 11.7% (5,296) |
Less than High School | 23.7% (5,721) | 8.2% (3,735) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (2,688) | 22.8% (10,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin vs Sierra vista
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Sierra vista.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 11.7% in Sierra vista.
- More residents in Franklin have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 8.2% in Sierra vista.
- In Sierra vista, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 11.1% in Franklin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.