Demographics details for Franklin, GA vs La mesa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin, GA vs La mesa, CA.
Data | Franklin | La mesa |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,128 | 60,360 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 36.3 years |
Median Income | $52,597 | $83,649 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Franklin vs La mesa
- The population in La mesa is higher at 60,360, compared to 24,128 in Franklin.
- Residents in Franklin have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 36.3 years in La mesa.
- La mesa has a higher median income of $83,649, compared to $52,597 in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Franklin at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in La mesa.
- Franklin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in La mesa.
- The unemployment rate in Franklin is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.3% in La mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin vs La mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Franklin | La mesa |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 8 |
White | 81 | 42 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 5 | 28 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin vs La mesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklin at 9% compared to 8% in La mesa.
- Franklin has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 42% in La mesa.
- In La mesa, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Franklin.
- La mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 28%, compared to 5% in Franklin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La mesa at 15%, compared to 3% in Franklin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Franklin at 1% compared to 0% in La mesa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Franklin | La mesa |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.5% |
Depression | 23.4% | 18.6% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.1% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 24.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin vs La mesa
- More residents in Franklin report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.3% in La mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Franklin at 23.4% compared to 18.6% in La mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklin at 19.9% compared to 11.5% in La mesa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in La mesa at 19.1% compared to 16.2% in Franklin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklin at 37.7% compared to 24.6% in La mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Franklin at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in La mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Franklin | La mesa |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (394) | 0.6% (346) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (3,969) | 10.8% (6,496) |
Less than High School | 23.7% (5,721) | 7.9% (4,771) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (2,688) | 26.9% (16,262) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin vs La mesa
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in La mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 10.8% in La mesa.
- More residents in Franklin have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 7.9% in La mesa.
- In La mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 11.1% in Franklin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.