Demographics details for Franklin park, IL vs Falmouth, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Franklin park, IL vs Falmouth, KY.

Data Franklin park Falmouth
Population 18,059 2,197
Median Age 36.5 years 35.2 years
Median Income $74,167 $38,021
Married Families 36.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Franklin park vs Falmouth

  • In Franklin park, the population is higher at 18,059, compared to 2,197 in Falmouth.
  • Residents in Franklin park have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 35.2 years in Falmouth.
  • Franklin park has a higher median income of $74,167 compared to $38,021 in Falmouth.
  • In Falmouth, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Franklin park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Falmouth at 12%, compared to 9% in Franklin park.
  • The unemployment rate in Franklin park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Falmouth.

Demographics

Demographics Franklin park vs Falmouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Franklin park Falmouth
Black 1 1
White 10 97
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 59 Data is updating
Two or More Races 23 2
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Franklin park vs Falmouth

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Franklin park and Falmouth at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falmouth at 97% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Franklin park at 5% compared to 0% in Falmouth.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Franklin park at 59% compared to 0% in Falmouth.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Franklin park at 23% compared to 2% in Falmouth.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Franklin park at 2% compared to 0% in Falmouth.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Franklin park Falmouth
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 21.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 16.8%
Depression 17.7% 30.3%
Smoking 14.4% 28.1%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.1%
Obesity 30.9% 40.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 31.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin park vs Falmouth

  • In Falmouth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.6% compared to 14.2% in Franklin park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falmouth at 30.3% versus 17.7% in Franklin park.
  • Falmouth has a higher smoking rate at 28.1% compared to 14.4% in Franklin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Franklin park at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Falmouth.
  • Falmouth has higher obesity rates at 40.9% compared to 30.9% in Franklin park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falmouth at 31.0% compared to 11.0% in Franklin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Franklin park Falmouth
No Schooling 2.5% (453) 0.7% (15)
High School Diploma 17.0% (3,067) 28.3% (622)
Less than High School 30.2% (5,452) 36.8% (809)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.7% (2,297) 6.1% (133)

Education Levels Comparison: Franklin park vs Falmouth

  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklin park have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Falmouth.
  • In Falmouth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 17.0% in Franklin park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Falmouth at 36.8%, compared to 30.2% in Franklin park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 6.1% in Falmouth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.